2009 Ford Flex vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 64 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Flex | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |