2009 Ford Flex vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2004 Samsung SM3. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Ford | Samsung |
| Model | Flex | SM3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
