2009 Ford Flex vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, both 2009 Ford Flex and 2009 Holden Epica were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Flex | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 336 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |