2009 Ford Focus vs. 1967 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2009 Ford Focus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Focus (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1967 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Focus weights approximately 786 kg more than 1967 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Focus (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (51 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Focus | 1967 Reliant Rebel | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Focus | Rebel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 51 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 27 L |