2009 Ford Focus vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2009 Ford Focus is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 MCC Silverpulse has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Focus has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Focus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MCC Silverpulse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Focus | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Focus | Silverpulse |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
