2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Fusion | 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Fusion | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3690 mm |
