2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1960 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Fusion (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fusion | 1960 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Fusion | Minx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |