2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Fusion | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fusion | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
