2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1971 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 4,140 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Holden Belmont (182 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Because 1971 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Belmont (356 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1971 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Fusion | 1971 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fusion | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4140 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 356 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1890 mm |
