2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Fusion (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fusion | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fusion | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |