2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (220 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJS (377 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fusion | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fusion | XJS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 377 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3650 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |