2009 Ford Fusion vs. 1995 Mazda 626

To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 161 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2009 Ford Fusion.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (212 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Fusion 1995 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Fusion 626
Year Released 2009 1995
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2261 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 161 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 212 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 966 kg 1266 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm