2009 Ford Fusion vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. Both 2009 Ford Fusion and 2005 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 2,261 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fusion | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fusion | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |