2009 Ford Galaxy vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Ford Galaxy is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Galaxy weights approximately 425 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Galaxy | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Galaxy | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2293 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2980 mm |