2009 Ford Galaxy vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Ford Galaxy is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Ford Galaxy.
Because 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Galaxy | 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Galaxy | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2293 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 107 L |
