2009 Ford Galaxy vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Ford Galaxy is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2009 Ford Galaxy. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 381 kg more than 2009 Ford Galaxy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Galaxy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Galaxy. (203 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Galaxy.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Galaxy | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Galaxy | XC90 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2293 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |