2009 Ford Ka vs. 1946 Simca 8
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1946 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 8.
Because 1946 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1946 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Ka | 8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1090 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |
