2009 Ford Ka vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 270 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Ka | RM A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2870 mm |