2009 Ford Ka vs. 1956 Saab 93
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 93 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1956 Saab 93. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1956 Saab 93.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Saab 93. (68 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Saab 93.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1956 Saab 93 | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | Ka | 93 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 54 L |
