2009 Ford Ka vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ka | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2060 mm |