2009 Ford Ka vs. 1962 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1962 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Ka | Jalta |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2030 mm |