2009 Ford Ka vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Saab 96 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Saab 96. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1966 Saab 96.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Saab 96 (116 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Saab 96 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1966 Saab 96 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Ka | 96 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 58.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 38 L |