2009 Ford Ka vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1970 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Ford | Datsun |
Model | Ka | 240Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 11 L/100km |