2009 Ford Ka vs. 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ka | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2960 mm |