2009 Ford Ka vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1975 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ka | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |
