2009 Ford Ka vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 186 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2510 mm |