2009 Ford Ka vs. 1983 Lancia Delta
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 1,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lancia Delta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Delta (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 106 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1983 Lancia Delta | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Ka | Delta |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1301 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 55.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2480 mm |
