2009 Ford Ka vs. 1986 Holden Astra
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (94 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 281 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (136 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1986 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ka | Astra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2420 mm |
