2009 Ford Ka vs. 1986 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault Rodeo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1986 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 70.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 34 L |