2009 Ford Ka vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ka | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3239 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2880 mm |
