2009 Ford Ka vs. 1992 Honda CRX
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda CRX would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Honda CRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Honda CRX (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Honda CRX (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Honda CRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1992 Honda CRX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ka | CRX |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |