2009 Ford Ka vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1992 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ka | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
