2009 Ford Ka vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |