2009 Ford Ka vs. 2000 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Samara II weights approximately 6 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Samara II (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Lada Samara II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2000 Lada Samara II | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Ka | Samara II |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |