2009 Ford Ka vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |