2009 Ford Ka vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 152 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (136 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Top Speed | 173 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |