2009 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ka weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ka | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1247 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2680 mm |
