2009 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Rover 75

To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Ka 2004 Rover 75
Make Ford Rover
Model Ka 75
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 1951 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 68 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 106 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74.1 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Acceleration 0-100mph 13.7 seconds 11.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.5 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 65 L