2009 Ford Ka vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (262 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka. 2005 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | Tribute |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 62 L |