2009 Ford Ka vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Spyker C8 weights approximately 463 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 2005 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Ford | Spyker |
| Model | Ka | C8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 887 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |
