2009 Ford Ka vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3

To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Land Rover LR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Land Rover LR3 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.

Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Ka 2006 Land Rover LR3
Make Ford Land Rover
Model Ka LR3
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 4392 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 68 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 106 Nm 427 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74.1 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 83 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4860 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1900 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.5 L/100km 14.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 86 L