2009 Ford Ka vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ka | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.1 seconds | 8.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |