2009 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ka | GT-R |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 588 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |