2009 Ford Ka vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Ka | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 279 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2765 mm |