2009 Ford Ka vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ka would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 249 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (136 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Ka | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |
