2009 Ford Kuga vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Kuga (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Kuga (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Kuga will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Kuga | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Kuga | 140 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |