2009 Ford Kuga vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Kuga weights approximately 280 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Kuga | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Kuga | 240 C |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |