2009 Ford Kuga vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Kuga weights approximately 380 kg more than 1981 Toyota Cressida.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Kuga | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Kuga | Cressida |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 13 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |
