2009 Ford Kuga vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2009 Ford Kuga is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2009 Ford Kuga. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Kuga.
Because 2009 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Kuga. (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Kuga.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Kuga | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Kuga | Etna |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |