2009 Ford Maverick vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Ford Maverick is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Ford Maverick. (148 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Maverick weights approximately 378 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2009 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Maverick | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Maverick | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 2288 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 27 L |
